Decision 1014S – California State Employees Association (Garcia)
S-CO-150-S
Decision Date: September 21, 1993
Decision Type: PERB Decision
Perc Vol: 17
Perc Index: 24153
Decision Headnotes
300.09000 – Participation in Board Process
Filing an unfair practice charge is protected activity.
800.04000 – Scope of Duty; Internal Union Affairs
The Board will ordinarily not review internal union matters unless the activities involved in the charge "have a substantial impact on the relationship of unit members to their employers." (Service Employees International Union, Local 99 (Kimmett) (1979) PERB Decision No. 106; p. 5. The union's activities in connection with telephone costs, election irregularities, and her suspension were not shown to have a substantial impact on her relationship with her employer; pp. 5-6.
801.01000 – In General
Notwithstanding a party's failure to allege facts sufficient to show a substantial impact on the employment relationship and thus a duty of fair representation, if the factual allegations would support a finding of retaliation, discrimination, or interference by an employee organization, the Board has statutory authority to inquire into the internal activities of the employee organization; p. 8.
806.02000 – Internal Union Procedures
The Board will ordinarily not review internal union matters unless the activities involved in the charge "have a substantial impact on the relationship of unit members to their employers." (Service Employees International Union, Local 99 (Kimmett) (1979) PERB Decision No. 106; p. 5. The union's activities in connection with telephone costs, election irregularities, and her suspension were not shown to have a substantial impact on her relationship with her employer; pp. 5-6.
1100.01000 – In General/Prima Facie Case
For review of an unfair practice charge, the factual allegations contained in the charge are considered true; p. 6.