EMPLOYER DISCRIMINATION; DEFENSES – In General

Single Topic for Decision 0869H

View all topics for Decision 0869H

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

After charging party has proven prima facie case, to avoid finding of discrimination, employer must show that it would have taken adverse action against employee even if that employee had not engaged in protected activity; pp. 20-21, proposed dec. CSU met its burden of showing that employee would have been terminated in absence of protected activity where CSU showed that it was employee's insistence on certain working conditions and his mental health and not his protected activities which caused his termination; pp. 15-16, proposed dec.