EMPLOYER DOMINATION OR ASSISTANCE; DEFENSES – In General

Single Topic for Decision 2306E

View all topics for Decision 2306E

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

Unfair practice charge alleging that the hiring of the union president by the school district for a management position interfered with the union’s internal activities by weakening the union and causing distrust among union members, and had a chilling effect on employees’ right to engage in protected activities, did not state a prima facie case of unlawful domination; charge did not set forth facts establishing that the school district was liable for the distrust or that its conduct tended to interfere with the internal activities of the union under EERA, section 35543, subdivision (d).