UNFAIR PRACTICE PROCEDURES; COMPLIANCE – In General

Single Topic for Decision 2799M


View all topics for Decision 2799M

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

1108.00000 – UNFAIR PRACTICE PROCEDURES; COMPLIANCE
1108.01000 – In General

Parties may argue to the compliance officer as to the import (if any) of negotiations they may have undertaken during any timeframe before PERB’s decision becomes final. (Compare County of Merced (2020) PERB Decision No. 2740-M, pp. 21-22 [employer could not rely on negotiations undertaken before PERB decision became final, as such negotiations did not lead to agreement and occurred before employer fully remedied its unfair practice] with Region 2 Court Interpreter Employment Committee & California Superior Courts of Region 2 (2020) PERB Decision No. 2701-I, p. 58 [where parties undertook negotiations in context of unremedied unfair practice but reached a superseding agreement, PERB deferred to agreement by discontinuing backpay remedy as of its effective date].)