EMPLOYER DOMINATION OR ASSISTANCE; DOMINATION OF OR ASSISTANCE TO LABOR ORGANIZATIONS – Special Facilities and Services

Single Topic for Decision I063E

View all topics for Decision I063E

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

The most common type of unlawful support case involves an employer that provides support to one of two competing nonexclusive representatives. The Board usually resolves such cases by deciding whether the employer failed to remain strictly neutral between the two competing organizations. The school district must treat both nonexclusive representatives equally with respect to financial or other support. (p. 22.) Here, the school district provided a high level of support to the existing nonexclusive representative because it is 100 percent employer-funded. Also, the school district dominated and interfered with the existing nonexclusive representative’s internal affairs and expressed a preference for the existing nonexclusive representative over the rival nonexclusive representative, while failing to offer the rival organization the same support. This was sufficient to establish reasonable cause to believe the school district violated—and continued to violate—EERA section 3543.5, subdivision (d)’s prohibition on contributing financial or other support to an employee organization. (pp. 25-26.)