All notes for Subtopic 1104.03000 – Proposed Decision
Decision | Description | PERC Vol. | PERC Index | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
2757M | City and County of San Francisco 1104.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; PROCEDURE BEFORE ALJ; Proposed Decision The Board held the ALJ properly found the respondent failed to establish good cause to excuse the late filing of its answer and thereby waived its right to a hearing. The Board further held the ALJ properly deemed the allegations in the complaint and underlying unfair practice charge to be true. more or view all topics or full text. | 45 | 84 | 03/03/21 |
2670M | County of Santa Clara 1104.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; PROCEDURE BEFORE ALJ; Proposed Decision Under PERB Regulation 32215, the Board may order the Division of Administrative Law to conduct an expedited hearing and, upon completion of the hearing, that the record be submitted to the Board itself for a decision on the merits. (p. 12.) more or view all topics or full text. | 44 | 67 | 09/20/19 |
1895E | Newark Unified School District 1104.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; PROCEDURE BEFORE ALJ; Proposed Decision While the Board finds that the proposed decision correctly concluded that health carrier language was negotiable as part of the Compensation Article, the Board will not speculate about the intent or nature of the Association's proposal in reaching that conclusion. more or view all topics or full text. | 31 | 78 | 03/27/07 |
A115E | Alum Rock Union School District/Mt. Diablo Unified School District 1104.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; PROCEDURE BEFORE ALJ; Proposed Decision Once a proposed decision has been issued, the administrative law judge has no further authority over the case. Neither the ALJ nor the Chief ALJ has the authority to reopen the hearing record after issuance of the proposed decision. more or view all topics or full text. | 5 | 12121 | 09/22/81 |
0899E | California School Employees Association (Gilligan) 1104.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; PROCEDURE BEFORE ALJ; Proposed Decision The expedited decision procedure adopted by the Board allows the parties to waive preparation of the written transcript of the formal hearing and requires the ALJ to issue a proposed decision within 30 days of the close of the case, if possible. Generally, this procedure is implemented upon agreement of the parties. Although charging party did not expressly agree to the expedited decision procedure, no prejudice was found as the decision relied upon a credibility determination; pp. 3-4. more or view all topics or full text. | 15 | 22139 | 08/30/91 |
0782E | Temple City Unified School District 1104.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; PROCEDURE BEFORE ALJ; Proposed Decision It is unnecessary to make a finding on the merits of the case after holding that the allegations must be deferred to arbitration. Finding by ALJ is rejected by the Board. more or view all topics or full text. | 14 | 21027 | 12/22/89 |
0185E | Nevada City School District 1104.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; PROCEDURE BEFORE ALJ; Proposed Decision Improper for ALJ to make findings of fact and conclusions of law over subjects (released time) of earlier charges which were withdrawn with prejudice after settlement. more or view all topics or full text. | 6 | 13007 | 12/04/81 |