Decision 0375Ea – San Mateo City School District
SF-CE-36
Decision Date: June 20, 1984
Decision Type: PERB Decision
Perc Vol: 8
Perc Index: 15114
Decision Headnotes
1202.01000 – In General
If subsequent to employer's unlawful unilateral change, parties reach agreement or negotiate through completion of the statutory impasse procedure concerning the subject matter of the unilateral change, it would not effectuate purposes of Act to restore status quo ante or to continue liability for back-pay beyond that point.
1201.03000 – Back Pay; Interest
If subsequent to employer's unlawful unilateral change, parties reach agreement or negotiate through completion of the statutory impasse procedure concerning the subject matter of the unilateral change, it would not effectuate purposes of Act to restore status quo ante or to continue liability for back-pay beyond that point.
1201.07000 – Private Agreements Concerning Reinstatement and Backpay
If subsequent to employer's unlawful unilateral change, parties reach agreement or negotiate through completion of the statutory impasse procedure concerning the subject matter of the unilateral change, it would not effectuate purposes of Act to restore status quo ante or to continue liability for back-pay beyond that point.
1202.02000 – Agreement Between. the Parties
If subsequent to employer's unlawful unilateral change, parties reach agreement or negotiate through completion of the statutory impasse procedure concerning the subject matter of the unilateral change, it would not effectuate purposes of Act to restore status quo ante or to continue liability for back-pay beyond that point.
1205.07000 – Restoration of Status Quo
If subsequent to employer's unlawful unilateral change, parties reach agreement or negotiate through completion of the statutory impasse procedure concerning the subject matter of the unilateral change, it would not effectuate purposes of Act to restore status quo ante or to continue liability for back-pay beyond that point.
1107.10000 – Request for Reconsideration
Reconsideration justified where remedy will not effectuate purposes of Act; p. 3.