Decision 0694H – Regents of the University of California (Waters)

LA-CE-220-H

Decision Date: July 26, 1988

Decision Type: PERB Decision

View Full Text (PDF)

Perc Vol: 12
Perc Index: 19137

Decision Headnotes

1101.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; LIMITATION PERIOD FOR FILING CHARGE
1101.01000 – In General

Charging Party required to file charge within six months of the alleged violation or when it was reasonably discovered.

1101.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; LIMITATION PERIOD FOR FILING CHARGE
1101.04000 – Continuing Violation

No continuing violation where employer's conduct during limitations period constitutes an unfair only by relation to the original offense.

400.00000 – EMPLOYER INTERFERENCE, RESTRAINT, COERCION; EMPLOYER INTERFERENCE WITH, RESTRAINT, OR COERCION OF EMPLOYEES
400.01000 – In General; Standards

Failure of university to provide copy of union contract per contract requirement does not constitute interference because the contract was available elsewhere.

700.00000 – EMPLOYER DOMINATION OR ASSISTANCE; DOMINATION OF OR ASSISTANCE TO LABOR ORGANIZATIONS
700.01000 – In General

Collusion of university and union which permitted university to avoid the obligation of passing out contracts to employees does not constitute interference, domination or assistance.

102.00000 – PERB: OPERATION, JURISDICTION, AUTHORITY; SCOPE OF PERB JURISDICTION
102.03000 – Enforcement of Settlement Agreements and Contracts 3541.5(b); 3514.5(b); 3563.2(b)

Failure by university to abide by contract clause does not state unfair practice by itself.