Decision 0875E – Los Rios Community College District
S-CE-1387-1403
Decision Date: May 14, 1991
Decision Type: PERB Decision
Perc Vol: 15
Perc Index: 22081
Decision Headnotes
1100.08000 – Pleading Requirements
Board dismissed unfair practice charges where even assuming charging parties engaged in protected activity, there were no factual allegations that District had knowledge of protected activity or that District took its actions as a result of such activity; p. 14. Board dismissed unfair practice charges where charging parties failed to present any facts which would establish that they engaged in protected activity; pp. 13-14.
1103.09000 – Consolidation, Severance, or Bifurcation of Proceedings
Consolidation of 17 charges appropriate on appeal where allegations in charges are identical, charging parties are similarly situated, and warning and dismissal letters in the separate charges were substantially identical; p. 6.
1107.01000 – Exceptions; Responses to Exceptions; Standing; Extensions of Time/Late Filing/Waiver
As PERB Regulation 32635 only provides for the filing of an appeal and a statement in opposition to an appeal, Board did not consider charging parties' additional and supplemental statements in reaching its decision; p. 13.
1107.20000 – Other
As allegations in unfair practice charges are identical and charging parties are similarly situated, Board found consolidation to be appropriate; p. 6.
1503.02000 – Regulations Considered (By Number)
32635: As PERB Regulation 32635 only provides for the filing of an appeal and a statement in opposition to an appeal, Board did not consider charging parties' additional and supplemental statements in reaching its decision; p. 13.
501.02000 – Burden of Proof; Evidence
No violation of section 3543.5(a) where District excluded certain part-time teachers from eligibility for a 20-year longevity, four percent salary bonus step in current collective bargaining agreement; p. 6. Board dismissed unfair practice charges where even assuming charging parties engaged in protected activity, there were no factual allegations that District had knowledge of protected activity or that District took its actions as a result of such activity; p. 14. Board dismissed unfair practice charges where charging parties failed to present any facts which would establish that they engaged in protected activity; pp. 13-14.