Decision 0907H – Regents of the University of California (University of California-American Federation of Teachers)

SF-CE-272-H; LA-CE-235-H

Decision Date: October 1, 1991

Decision Type: PERB Decision

View Full Text (PDF)

Perc Vol: 15
Perc Index: 22166

Decision Headnotes

602.00000 – EMPLOYER REFUSAL TO BARGAIN IN GOOD FAITH; UNILATERAL CHANGE (FOR NEGOT OF SPECIFIC SUBJECTS, SEE SEC 1000, SCOPE OF REPRESENTATION)
602.03000 – Contract Repudiation or Breach

UC violated 3571(b) and (c) of HEERA when it injected criteria not agreed upon by the parties into the determination of post-six-year appointments, thereby unilaterally inplementing a change in the parties' agreed upon policy.

1101.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; LIMITATION PERIOD FOR FILING CHARGE
1101.01000 – In General

Employees who appear at a grievance meeting as grievants are not considered agents of the union for purposes of notice absent evidence that they were grievance representatives of the union.

1101.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; LIMITATION PERIOD FOR FILING CHARGE
1101.07000 – Waiver; Estoppel

Employees who appear at a grievance meeting as grievants are not considered agents of the union for purposes of notice absent evidence that they were grievance representatives of the union.

1201.00000 – REMEDIES FOR UNFAIR PRACTICES; REINSTATEMENT; BACKPAY BENEFITS
1201.01000 – In General

Absent exigent circumstances, a remedy should not order something that is in contravention of the contract in a unilateral change case.

1201.00000 – REMEDIES FOR UNFAIR PRACTICES; REINSTATEMENT; BACKPAY BENEFITS
1201.02000 – Reinstatement

Absent exigent circumstances, a remedy should not order something that is in contravention of the contract in a unilateral change case.