Decision 0907H – Regents of the University of California (University of California-American Federation of Teachers)

SF-CE-272-H; LA-CE-235-H

Decision Date: October 1, 1991

Decision Type: PERB Decision

Perc Vol: 15
Perc Index: 22166

Decision Headnotes

602.00000 – EMPLOYER REFUSAL TO BARGAIN IN GOOD FAITH; UNILATERAL CHANGE (FOR NEGOT OF SPECIFIC SUBJECTS, SEE SEC 1000, SCOPE OF REPRESENTATION)
602.03000 – Change in or Deviation from Written Agreement or Policy

UC violated 3571(b) and (c) of HEERA when it injected criteria not agreed upon by the parties into the determination of post-six-year appointments, thereby unilaterally inplementing a change in the parties' agreed upon policy.

1101.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; LIMITATION PERIOD FOR FILING CHARGE
1101.01000 – In General

Employees who appear at a grievance meeting as grievants are not considered agents of the union for purposes of notice absent evidence that they were grievance representatives of the union.

1101.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; LIMITATION PERIOD FOR FILING CHARGE
1101.07000 – Waiver; Estoppel

Employees who appear at a grievance meeting as grievants are not considered agents of the union for purposes of notice absent evidence that they were grievance representatives of the union.

1201.00000 – REMEDIES FOR UNFAIR PRACTICES; REINSTATEMENT; BACKPAY BENEFITS
1201.01000 – In General

Absent exigent circumstances, a remedy should not order something that is in contravention of the contract in a unilateral change case.

1201.00000 – REMEDIES FOR UNFAIR PRACTICES; REINSTATEMENT; BACKPAY BENEFITS
1201.02000 – Reinstatement

Absent exigent circumstances, a remedy should not order something that is in contravention of the contract in a unilateral change case.