Decision 0917E – Travis Unified School District

SF-CE-1307

Decision Date: January 3, 1992

Decision Type: PERB Decision

View Full Text (PDF)

Perc Vol: 16
Perc Index: 23022

Decision Headnotes

1000.00000 – SCOPE OF REPRESENTATION
1000.02165 – Statutory Rights

EERA section 3543.1(a) grants an exclusive representative the statutory right to represent its members by filing grievances in its own name; p. 16, proposed dec. Exclusive representative's right to file grievances in its own name is a nonmandatory subject of negotiations; insistence to impasse on a nonmandatory subject is a per se violation; p. 14-15, proposed dec.

605.00000 – EMPLOYER REFUSAL TO BARGAIN IN GOOD FAITH; OTHER PER SE VIOLATIONS
605.02000 – Insistence on Nonmandatory/Illegal Subjects (See also Scope of Representation, Sec 1000)

Exclusive representative's right to file grievances in its own name is a nonmandatory subject of negotiations; insistence to impasse on a nonmandatory subject is a per se violation; p. 14-15, proposed dec. While the Association did not explicitly state that the proposals in question were "outside the scope of bargaining," the Association did make clear its contention that it was improper for the District to insist on language which it believed deprived it of its statutory rights. See Chula Vista No. 834, p. 26; p. 4.

1000.00000 – SCOPE OF REPRESENTATION
1000.02057 – Grievance Procedure

Exclusive representative's right to file grievances in its own name is a nonmandatory subject of negotiations; p. 14, proposed dec. EERA section 3543.1(a) grants an exclusive representative the statutory right to represent its members by filing grievances in its own name; p. 16, proposed dec.

1000.00000 – SCOPE OF REPRESENTATION
1000.02167 – Exclusive Representative’s Right to File Grievances

EERA section 3543.1(a) grants an exclusive representative the statutory right to represent its members by filing grievances in its own name; p. 16, proposed dec. Exclusive representative's right to file grievances in its own name is a nonmandatory subject of negotiations; insistence to impasse on a nonmandatory subject is a per se violation; p. 14-15, proposed dec.

1103.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; COMPLAINT
1103.04000 – Amendments

The Board found it unnecessary to address the ALJ's authority to amend the complaint during the hearing process; p. 2.