Decision 1314H – Regents of the University of California (Coalition of University Employees)
LA-CE-522-H
Decision Date: February 1, 1999
Decision Type: PERB Decision
Description: Union appealed Board agent’s dismissal of unfair practice charge against the University alleging that it violated HEERA by withholding information and dismissing employee in retaliation for her protected activities.
Disposition: Dismissed. Union failed to state a prima facie case.
Perc Vol: 23
Perc Index: 30056
Decision Headnotes
504.14000 – Other/In General
Charge fails to state a prima facie case for violation of HEERA section 3571(a) where charge fails to allege any facts demonstrating that employee's protected activity motivated the University's conduct; p. 5, dismissal letter.
300.09000 – Participation in Board Process
Employee engaged in protected activity by filing a grievance challenging her layoff and by allowing herself to be the subject of two unfair practice charges; p. 8, dismissal letter.
300.05000 – Grievances
Employee engaged in protected activity by filing a grievance challenging her layoff and by allowing herself to be the subject of two unfair practice charge; p. 8, dismissal letter.
604.01000 – In General
University did not fail or refuse to provide necessary and relevant information when it provided the requested information within 10 working days of the Union's request and Union could demonstrate no harm from delay; p. 4, dismissal letter. University did not fail or refuse to provide relevant and necessary information when it required an employee to execute a release before providing employee medical information to the Union; p. 4, dismissal letter.
604.04000 – Confidentiality; Privacy
University did not fail or refuse to provide relevant and necessary information when it required an employee to execute a release before providing employee medical information to the Union; p. 4, dismissal letter.