Decision 1352E – American Federation of Teachers, et al. (Kok)

LA-CO-798

Decision Date: September 29, 1999

Decision Type: PERB Decision

View Full Text (PDF)

Perc Vol: 23
Perc Index: 30172

Decision Headnotes

1100.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE
1100.01000 – In General/Prima Facie Case

Charging party must provide facts demonstrating a prima facie violation; mere legal conclusions are insufficient. State of California, Department of Food and Agriculture (1994) PERB Decision No. 1071-S.

1101.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; LIMITATION PERIOD FOR FILING CHARGE
1101.01000 – In General

Charge was untimely because it was clear in October 1997 that union was not going to assist the charging party in pursuit of his grievance or request for arbitration. This charge was filed on more than 18 months later.

1101.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; LIMITATION PERIOD FOR FILING CHARGE
1101.06000 – Statutory and Equitable Tolling

Grievance filed against the employer does not toll the statute with regard to claim against union. Filing of previous charges and claims with PERB and the courts do not toll the statute of limitations. PERB has found that the EERA only permits tolling by the filing of a grievance under a contract procedure that ends in binding arbitration. (San Dieguito Union High School District (1982) PERB Decision No. 194. There is no equitable tolling in PERB proceedings. (San Diego Unified School District (1992) PERB Decision 885.)