Decision 1421S – California State Employees Association (Bradford)

SA-CO-232-S

Decision Date: February 26, 2001

Decision Type: PERB Decision

Description: The Board dismissed the unfair practice charge. The charge alleged that the employee organization breached the duty of fair representation.

Disposition: Dismissed. The duty of fair representation does not extend to extra-contractual matters.

View Full Text (PDF)

Perc Vol: 25
Perc Index: 32040

Decision Headnotes

800.00000 – UNION UNFAIR PRACTICES; DUTY OF FAIR REPRESENTATION
800.02000 – Grievance Handling/Contract Administration

Union's failure to assist employee with his request that State agree to waive timelines to file a grievance does not breach the duty of fair representation when facts fail to show union's action was without rational basis or devoid of honest judgment.

800.00000 – UNION UNFAIR PRACTICES; DUTY OF FAIR REPRESENTATION
800.04000 – Scope of Duty; Internal Union Affairs

Duty of fair representation does not extend to extra-contractual matters of appeal from Rejection During Probation before the State Personnel Board or reasonable accommodation appeal to State Personnel Board. Duty of fair representation does not require Union to provide information relating to expenses associated with various types of litigation it may have engaged in against a particular appointing authority.

800.00000 – UNION UNFAIR PRACTICES; DUTY OF FAIR REPRESENTATION
800.06000 – Other

Duty of fair representation does not require Union to provide information relating to expenses associated with various types of litigation it may have engaged in against a particular appointing authority.