Decision 1558S – State of California (Department of Motor Vehicles)
LA-CE-607-S
Decision Date: November 21, 2003
Decision Type: PERB Decision
Description: Union alleged that State violated Dills Act by using existing security system as timekeeping device. Board found that change was not within scope of representation.
Disposition: Board dismissed charge.
Perc Vol: 28
Perc Index: 16
Decision Headnotes
604.01000 – In General
Refusal to provide information does not state prima facie case because check-in/check-out system is not negotiable and the charge does not demonstrate how the requested information is necessary and relevant to union’s right to represent bargaining unit members.
604.05000 – Subjects of Information
Refusal to provide information does not state prima facie case because check-in/check-out system is not negotiable and the charge does not demonstrate how the requested information is necessary and relevant to union’s right to represent bargaining unit members.
1000.02064 – Hours of Work
Charge alleged that employer unilaterally implemented a timekeeping device by requiring employee to activate alarm system and to sign out at the end of workday. Board found dismissed charge on the grounds that a check-in/check-out system implemented for security purposes in not within the scope of representation unless there is an impact on the length of the workday.
1000.02133 – Sign-in/Sign-out Policy
Charge alleged that employer unilaterally implemented a timekeeping device by requiring employee to activate alarm system and to sign out at the end of workday. Board found dismissed charge on the grounds that a check-in/check-out system implemented for security purposes in not within the scope of representation unless there is an impact on the length of the workday.