Decision 1626H – California State Employees Association, California State University Division (Sarca)
SA-CO-18-H
Decision Date: April 29, 2004
Decision Type: PERB Decision
Description: Charge alleged that agency fee arbitration decision was repugnant because arbitrator allowed the improper calculation of agency fees. Board found arbitration decision reasonable and dismissed charge.
Disposition: Board dismissed charge.
Perc Vol: 28
Perc Index: 147
Decision Headnotes
803.01000 – In General
Board rejected charging party’s contention that union’s surplus funds must be subtracted from any expenses charged to agency fee payers.
803.02000 – Proper Uses
Board rejected charging party’s contention that union’s surplus funds must be subtracted from any expenses charged to agency fee payers.
1102.02000 – Post Arbitration; Repugnancy
Even though charging party’s closing brief was not forwarded to arbitrator, arbitration decision was not repugnant to HEERA because arbitrator took notice of charging party’s position during closing arguments at hearing. Failure of arbitrator and parties to discuss law during arbitration does not form the basis for repugnancy.