Decision 1653E – Compton Community College District
LA-CE-4734-E
Decision Date: June 30, 2004
Decision Type: PERB Decision
Description: Warning and dismissal letters were issued by Board agent without amendment to claim. Malik then filed one sentence appeal that did not conform to requirements of PERB Regulation 32635 (a).
Disposition: Appeal was dismissed as outside requirements of PERB Regulation 32635(a).
Appeal shall state specific issues of procedure, fact, law or rational for which appeal is taken and identify the page or part of the dismissal to which each appeal is taken. The grounds for each issue shall also be included.
Perc Vol: 28
Perc Index: 192
Decision Headnotes
1100.05000 – Dismissal of Charge; Appeal
An appeal filed in response to a board agent dismissal must include facts related to the who, what, when or how of the underlying charge. Without facts as to dates or conduct giving rise to the charge the appeal cannot be considered. PERB regulation 32635(a) requires that the appeal state the specific issues of procedure, fact, law or rationale, identify the page or part of the dismissal to which the appeal is taken and state the grounds for each issue included.
1107.06000 – De Novo Review; Standard of Review by Board
An appeal filed in response to a board agent dismissal must include facts related to the who, what, when or how of the underlying charge. Without facts as to dates or conduct giving rise to the charge the appeal cannot be considered. PERB regulation 32635(a) requires that the appeal state the specific issues of procedure, fact, law or rationale, identify the page or part of the dismissal to which the appeal is taken and state the grounds for each issue included.