Decision 1655M – Marin County Law Library
SF-CE-159-M
Decision Date: July 2, 2004
Decision Type: PERB Decision
Description: Request for reconsideration not granted when same facts presented on appeal were set forth and no grounds set forth in PERB Regulation 32410 were included.
Disposition: Charge must indicate protected activity and nexus with adverse action to establish prima facie case of unfair practice. Board found no protected activity.
Perc Vol: 28
Perc Index: 195
Decision Headnotes
300.04000 – Individual/Concerted/Activities/Self-Representation
Decorating a library cart, asking for a job description and requesting a schedule change does not constitute protected activities. Complaining to library patrons about working conditions may constitute protected activity but there is no information demonstrating that patrons informed the supervisor of the complaints.
300.06000 – Demands for Change in Working Conditions
Decorating a library cart, asking for a job description and requesting a schedule change does not constitute protected activities. Complaining to library patrons about working conditions may constitute protected activity but there is no information demonstrating that patrons informed the supervisor of the complaints.
501.01000 – In General; Elements of Prima Facie Case
Activity must be protected activity and their must be a nexus with adverse action to establish a prima facie case of unfair labor practice. Where the activities of charging party were not protected activity, and no nexus was established with adverse action, there was no prima facie case established.
1100.01000 – In General/Prima Facie Case
Activity must be protected activity and their must be a nexus with adverse action to establish a prima facie case of unfair labor practice. Where the activities of charging party were not protected activity, and no nexus was established with adverse action, there was no prima facie case established.