1. Home
  2. Decisions
  3. Decision 2899S - State of California (State Teachers' Retirement System)

Decision 1669M – Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District

SF-CE-103-M

Decision Date: July 28, 2004

Decision Type: PERB Decision

Description:  District charged with unlawfully assisting decertification effort.

Disposition:  No unlawful interference by employer by letter to employees informing of deficiencies in decertification petition and provision to employees of applicable rules and regulations governing decertification petitions.

View Full Text (PDF)

Perc Vol: 28
Perc Index: 213

Decision Headnotes

401.00000 – EMPLOYER INTERFERENCE, RESTRAINT, COERCION, EMPLOYER CONDUCT AFFECTING ORGANIZING, UNION ACCESS; SOLICITATION, AND OTHER UNION RIGHTS
401.01000 – In General; Prima Facie Case.

District’s letter to employees informing them of deficiencies in decertification petition and provision to employees of applicable rules and regulations governing decertification petitions do not constitute unlawful assistance.

407.00000 – EMPLOYER INTERFERENCE, RESTRAINT, COERCION; INTERFERENCE WITH DECERTIFICATION OR RIVAL UNION PETITION
407.04000 – Employer Favoritism/Absence of Strict Neutrality

District’s letter to employees informing them of deficiencies in decertification petition and provision to employees of applicable rules and regulations governing decertification petitions do not constitute unlawful assistance.

700.00000 – EMPLOYER DOMINATION OR ASSISTANCE; DOMINATION OF OR ASSISTANCE TO LABOR ORGANIZATIONS
700.04000 – Management Aid or Instigation in Forming Unions Committees, Etc.; Statements in General; Free Speech

District’s letter to employees informing them of deficiencies in decertification petition and provision to employees of applicable rules and regulations governing decertification petitions do not constitute unlawful assistance.

701.00000 – EMPLOYER DOMINATION OR ASSISTANCE; DEFENSES
701.01000 – In General

District’s letter to employees informing them of deficiencies in decertification petition and provision to employees of applicable rules and regulations governing decertification petitions do not constitute unlawful assistance.