Decision 1718E – Madera Unified School District
SA-CE-2236-E
Decision Date: November 30, 2004
Decision Type: PERB Decision
Description: Employee alleged disparate treatment by employer.
Disposition: No employer discrimination or disparate treatment where charging party failed to set forth facts showing disparate treatment. Timing alone does not establish nexus between adverse action and protected activity.
Perc Vol: 29
Perc Index: 24
Decision Headnotes
504.02000 – Disparate Treatment
Charging party did not establish that she was treated in a disparate manner when she failed to set forth anything showing she had been treated differently than other teachers similarly situated (those with conflicts and/or interpersonal problems with other teachers even if without fault).
504.04000 – Timing of Action
Timing alone does not establish nexus between adverse action and protected conduct. Although transfer of teachers was a few months after charging party filed grievance, problem related to transfer existed long before that time.