Decision 1723S – State of California (Department of Corrections)

SA-CE-1434-S

Decision Date: December 13, 2004

Decision Type: PERB Decision

Description:  Unfair practice charged for discipline allegedly based on protected activity where employee told psych techs to go against written policy and act in a manner inconsistent with management directives.

Disposition:  Board found no protected activity nexus to discipline. Telling employees to violate management directives is not protected activity.

 

View Full Text (PDF)

Perc Vol: 29
Perc Index: 28

Decision Headnotes

300.00000 – UNFAIR PRACTICE ISSUES; PROTECTED ACTIVITIES
300.01000 – In General

Charging party was disciplined not for protected activity but instead for telling psych techs to go against written policy and act in a manner inconsistent with management directives. Telling employees to violate management directives is not protected activity.

300.00000 – UNFAIR PRACTICE ISSUES; PROTECTED ACTIVITIES
300.17000 – Other

Charging party was not disciplined for protected activity but instead for telling psych techs to go against written policy and act in a manner inconsistent with management directives. Telling employees to violate management directives is not protected activity.