Decision 1885E – Kern High Faculty Association, CTA/NEA (Maaskant)

LA-CO-1212-E

Decision Date: February 14, 2007

Decision Type: PERB Decision

Description:  The Board affirmed the dismissal of an unfair practice charge in which the charging party alleged the Faculty Association committed an unfair labor practice when it refused to let the charging party serve on its representative council because he was an agency fee payer.

Disposition:  Noting it had limited jurisdiction over cases involving internal union affairs, the Board held that it lacked jurisdiction over the duty of fair representation charge because it failed to allege the Faculty Association’s decision adversely affected the charging party’s relationship with his employer.

View Full Text (PDF)

Perc Vol: 31
Perc Index: 63

Decision Headnotes

101.00000 – PERB: OPERATION, JURISDICTION, AUTHORITY; APPLICABILITY OF AND CONFLICTS WITH OTHER STATUTES
101.01000 – In General

The Board lacks jurisdiction over alleged constitutional violations.

800.00000 – UNION UNFAIR PRACTICES; DUTY OF FAIR REPRESENTATION
800.01000 – In General; Prima Facie Case

The Board will not interfere in the internal affairs of a union unless they have a substantial impact on the relationships of unit members to their employers so as to give rise to a duty of fair representation, or involve retaliations for protected activity.

806.00000 – UNION UNFAIR PRACTICES; DEFENSES
806.02000 – Internal Union Procedures

The Board will not interfere in the internal affairs of a union unless they have a substantial impact on the relationships of unit members to their employers so as to give rise to a duty of fair representation, or involve retaliations for protected activity. Regarding union officer positions, participation in union elections is an internal union affair. Accordingly, the Board traditionally declines to interfere in union elections unless they substantially impact the member’s relationship with his/her employer.