Decision 1926H – Trustees of the California State University

LA-CE-779-H

Decision Date: October 31, 2007

Decision Type: PERB Decision

View Full Text (PDF)

Perc Vol: 31
Perc Index: 152

Decision Headnotes

601.00000 – EMPLOYER REFUSAL TO BARGAIN IN GOOD FAITH; REFUSAL TO BARGAIN IN GOOD FAITH (FOR SPECIFIC SUBJECTS, SEE SCOPE OF REPRESENTATION, SEC 1000)
601.03000 – Decision vs Effects Bargaining

While the decision to implement a computer policy is within CSU’s exercise of managerial prerogative, the action does not relieve CSU of the duty to negotiate the effects of the decision on bargaining unit members if it impacts matters within the scope of representation, e.g., discipline and union access rights.

602.00000 – EMPLOYER REFUSAL TO BARGAIN IN GOOD FAITH; UNILATERAL CHANGE (FOR NEGOT OF SPECIFIC SUBJECTS, SEE SEC 1000, SCOPE OF REPRESENTATION)
602.01000 – In General

The decision to implement a computer resource policy is a managerial prerogative and not negotiable. The Board distinguished this case from Trustees of the California State University (2003) PERB Decision No. 1507-H wherein the Board held that the subject matter within the policy fell within the scope of representation.

608.00000 – EMPLOYER REFUSAL TO BARGAIN IN GOOD FAITH; DEFENSES
608.07000 – Waiver by Union; Contract Waivers; Bargaining History Estoppel; Disclaimer; Supersession

Because there was no duty to bargain the decision to implement the policy, the zipper clause was inapplicable.

1000.00000 – SCOPE OF REPRESENTATION
1000.01000 – In General; Test for Subjects Not Specifically Enumerated

The decision to implement a computer policy is within CSU’s exercise of managerial prerogative because computer policies are necessary for CSU to provide its educational mission. “Computing resources support virtually every facet of [CSU’s] operations, including student admissions, registration, advisement, instruction, health care services, library services, research, communications, fund-raising, business and finance, plant operations, human resources, and public safety.” Additionally, computer networks are constantly under attack from viruses and worms which have the potential to take down an entire computer network thereby preventing CSU from providing its educational mission.

1000.00000 – SCOPE OF REPRESENTATION
1000.02002 – Access – Subject of Bargaining

The decision to implement a computer policy is within CSU’s exercise of managerial prerogative because computer policies are necessary for CSU to provide its educational mission. “Computing resources support virtually every facet of [CSU’s] operations, including student admissions, registration, advisement, instruction, health care services, library services, research, communications, fund-raising, business and finance, plant operations, human resources, and public safety.” Additionally, computer networks are constantly under attack from viruses and worms which have the potential to take down an entire computer network thereby preventing CSU from providing its educational mission.

1000.00000 – SCOPE OF REPRESENTATION
1000.02151 – Use of District Facilities, Equipment

The decision to implement a computer policy is within CSU’s exercise of managerial prerogative because computer policies are necessary for CSU to provide its educational mission. “Computing resources support virtually every facet of [CSU’s] operations, including student admissions, registration, advisement, instruction, health care services, library services, research, communications, fund-raising, business and finance, plant operations, human resources, and public safety.” Additionally, computer networks are constantly under attack from viruses and worms which have the potential to take down an entire computer network thereby preventing CSU from providing its educational mission.