1. Home
  2. Decisions
  3. Decision 2899S - State of California (State Teachers' Retirement System)

Decision 1939M – Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency

SA-CE-476-M

Decision Date: January 11, 2008

Decision Type: PERB Decision

View Full Text (PDF)

Perc Vol: 32
Perc Index: 35

Decision Headnotes

602.00000 – EMPLOYER REFUSAL TO BARGAIN IN GOOD FAITH; UNILATERAL CHANGE (FOR NEGOT OF SPECIFIC SUBJECTS, SEE SEC 1000, SCOPE OF REPRESENTATION)
602.06000 – Change in Past Practice

If changes in job duties are reasonably comprehended within the existing job duties, an assignment of such duties, even if never performed before, is not a violation. (Rio Hondo Community College District (1982) PERB Decision No. 279.)

1100.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE
1100.08000 – Pleading Requirements

The charging party has the burden of alleging the specifics (who, what) of a charge. If changes in job duties are reasonably comprehended within the existing job duties, an assignment of such duties, even if never performed before, is not a violation. (Rio Hondo Community College District (1982) PERB Decision No. 279.) The charging party has the burden of alleging why the allegedly new duties are not reasonably comprehended within the existing job duties.