Decision 2512M – East Bay Municipal Utility District
Decision Date: January 26, 2017
Decision Type: PERB Decision (Non-Precedential)
Description: Charging party alleged that the Utility District violated the MMBA in numerous ways including issuing a warning memorandum, issuing a counseling memorandum, denying her request for a modified work schedule, and not asking for her signature on a hiring authorization form. Charging party also alleged that the District violated its Employer-Employee Relations Policy and other provisions of the Government Code. Lastly, charging party alleged that the District violated her constitutional rights, including her rights to due process and free speech, and retaliated against her for whistle-blowing.
Disposition: The Office of the General Counsel issued a complaint based on the allegation that the District retaliated against charging party by issuing a warning memorandum. The Office of the General Counsel dismissed all other allegations. The Board affirmed the partial dismissal of the charge and adopted the partial warning and partial dismissal letters of the Office of the General Counsel.
Perc Vol: 41
Perc Index: 124