Decision A164E – Peralta Community College District
SF-UM-385; D-156
Decision Date: June 18, 1987
Decision Type: Administrative Appeal
Perc Vol: 11
Perc Index: 18110
Decision Headnotes
1303.01000 – In General
As issue voted on by employees was identical to that which would have been presented by a decertification election alone, Board finds that employees were not misled or otherwise affected by the appearance on the ballot of the unit configuration question. Therefore, no new election ordered; pp. 10-11.
1310.04000 – Decertification and Unit Modification
A decertification petition, which is properly filed in established unit and contains requisite proof of service, shall be given priority over a unit modification petition, so long as no formal determination on the merits of the unit modification petition have been made at the time the decertification petition is filed; p. 8.
1309.01000 – In General/Definition of Appropriate Unit
Where the appropriateness of the unit is in dispute, the Board must make a formal determination as to the appropriate unit configuration; p. 7.
1107.03000 – Remand for Further Hearing; Remand to General Counsel
As record is insufficient to allow Board to make any determination of status of certain employees in decertification petition, Board remands issue to regional office; p. 11.
1302.01000 – In General; Filing Requirements
A decertification petition, which is properly filed in established unit and contains requisite proof of support, shall be given priority over a unit modification petition, so long as no formal determination on the merits of the unit modification petition have been made at the time the decertification petition is filed; p. 8. As record is insufficient to allow Board to make any determination of status of certain employees in decertification petition, Board remands issue to regional office; p. 11. As issue voted on by employees was identical to that which would have been presented by a decertification election alone, Board finds that employees were not misled or otherwise affected by the appearance on the ballot of the unit configuration question. Therefore, no new election ordered; pp. 10-11. election ordered; pp. 10-11.
1303.03000 – Ballot Language
As issue voted on by employees was identical to that which would have been presented by a decertification election alone, Board finds that employees were not misled or otherwise affected by the appearance on the ballot of the unit configuration question. Therefore, no new election ordered; pp. 10-11.