Decision A248Ea – Fremont Union Union High School District
SF-CE-1557
Decision Date: November 23, 1993
Decision Type: Administrative Appeal
Perc Vol: 18
Perc Index: 25013
Decision Headnotes
102.01000 – In General/Exclusive Initial Jurisdiction-Deferral to Arbitration; Deference by Reviewing Courts
In determining whether deferral to arbitration is appropriate, the Board determines whether the contract covers the alleged unfair practice, a party's opinion about the legality of the act is not admissible evidence.
1102.01000 – Pre-Arbitration
In determining whether deferral to arbitration is appropriate, the Board determines whether the contract covers the alleged unfair practice, a party's opinion about the legality of the act is not admissible evidence.
1107.10000 – Request for Reconsideration
Statements in a grievance which constitute the Association's legal opinion that the District violated state laws is not admissible evidence; p. 4.
1404.01000 – In General
In determining whether deferral to arbitration is appropriate, the Board determines whether the contract covers the alleged unfair practice, a party's opinion about the legality of the act is not admissible evidence.
1503.03000 – Regulations Considered (By Number) (Continued)
32410(a). A party's opinion about the legality of an act is not admissible evidence and therefore does not satisfy the requirements of the regulation; p. 4.
1105.09000 – Opinion Evidence and Expert Testimony
Statements in a grievance which constitute the Association's legal opinion that the District violated state laws is not admissible evidence; p. 4.
1105.19000 – Newly Discovered Evidence
Statements in a grievance which constitute the Association's legal opinion that the District violated state laws is not admissible evidence; p. 4.