Decision A439S – Service Employees International Union, Local 1000 (Mykles)
SA-CO-480-S
Decision Date: June 16, 2016
Decision Type: Administrative Appeal
Description: An exclusive representative appealed from an administrative determination that it had not complied with the time limits set forth in PERB regulations for filing its opposition to an appeal from dismissal of an unfair practice charge brought by an employee against the representative.
Disposition: Because charging party’s appeal from dismissal of his unfair practice charge was addressed in a non-precedential decision, the Board issued a separate, precedential decision summarily denying the representative’s appeal from the administrative determination as moot.
Perc Vol: 41
Perc Index: 2
Decision Headnotes
1100.05000 – Dismissal of Charge; Appeal
An exclusive representative appealed from an administrative determination that it had not complied with the time limits set forth in PERB regulations for filing its opposition to an appeal from dismissal of an unfair practice charge brought by an employee against the representative. Because charging party’s appeal from the dismissal of his unfair practice charge was addressed in a non-precedential decision, the Board issued a separate, precedential decision summarily denying the representative’s appeal from an administrative determination as moot.
1107.05000 – Precedential Authority of PERB Decisions
An exclusive representative appealed from an administrative determination that it had not complied with the time limits set forth in PERB regulations for filing its opposition to an appeal from dismissal of an unfair practice charge brought by an employee against the representative. Because charging party’s appeal from the dismissal of his unfair practice charge was addressed in a non-precedential decision, the Board issued a separate, precedential decision summarily denying the representative’s appeal from an administrative determination as moot.
1406.00000 – In General
An exclusive representative appealed from an administrative determination that it had not complied with the time limits set forth in PERB regulations for filing its opposition to an appeal from dismissal of an unfair practice charge brought by an employee against the representative. Because charging party’s appeal from the dismissal of his unfair practice charge was addressed in a non-precedential decision, the Board issued a separate, precedential decision summarily denying the representative’s appeal from an administrative determination as moot.