Decision A168S – California Correctional Peace Officers Association (Ford)

LA-CO-23-S

Decision Date: April 21, 1988

Decision Type: PERB Decision

View Full Text (PDF)

Perc Vol: 12
Perc Index: 19062

Decision Headnotes

1107.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES;PROCEDURES BEFORE THE BOARD
1107.01000 – Exceptions; Responses to Exceptions; Standing; Extensions of Time/Late Filing/Waiver

Board denied request for special permission to appeal motion for disqualification of administrative law judge as granting such interlocutory review would not effectuate the purposes of the Act; p. 3. Where special permission to appeal ALJ's refusal to disqualify himself is denied, the moving party may reassert its arguments in its exceptions to the ALJ's proposed decision; p. 2.

1107.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES;PROCEDURES BEFORE THE BOARD
1107.12000 – Interlocutory Appeal

Board denied request for special permission to appeal motion for disqualification of administrative law judge as granting such interlocutory review would not effectuate the purposes of the Act; p. 3.

1107.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES;PROCEDURES BEFORE THE BOARD
1107.16000 – Disqualification or Bias of Board Agent

Board denied request for special permission to appeal motion for disqualification of administrative law judge as granting such interlocutory review would not effectuate the purposes of the Act; p. 3. Where special permission to appeal ALJ's refusal to disqualify himself is denied, the moving party may reassert its arguments in its exceptions to the ALJ's proposed decision; p. 2.

1104.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; PROCEDURE BEFORE ALJ
1104.07000 – Bias or Prejudice/Motion to Disqualify

Board denied request for special permission to appeal motion for disqualification of administrative law judge as granting such interlocutory review would not effectuate the purposes of the Act; p. 3. Where special permission to appeal ALJ's refusal to disqualify himself is denied, the moving party may reassert its arguments in its exceptions to the ALJ's proposed decision; p. 2.