Decision A394M – Stanislaus Consolidated Fire Protection District
SA-CE-711-M
Decision Date: May 23, 2012
Decision Type: Administrative Appeal
Description: The Stanislaus Consolidated Fire Protection District failed to file its request for an extension of time to file a request for reconsideration in a timely fashion.
Disposition: The Board upheld the administrative determination by the Appeals Assistant that the request for extension was untimely, concluding that there was no good cause to excuse the untimeliness, and even if there were, there was no merit to the request for reconsideration.
Perc Vol: 36
Perc Index: 186
Decision Headnotes
1100.05000 – Dismissal of Charge; Appeal
Board denied respondent’s request for extension of time to file request for reconsideration where respondent filed the request for extension of time four days after it was due under PERB Regulation 32132, subdivision (a), and one day after the request for reconsideration was due; these circumstances do not demonstrate that the respondent made a conscientious effort to timely file and therefore good cause to excuse the late-filed request for extension of time was not found to exist.
1107.01000 – Exceptions; Responses to Exceptions; Standing; Extensions of Time/Late Filing/Waiver
Board denied respondent’s request for extension of time to file request for reconsideration where respondent filed the request for extension of time four days after it was due under PERB Regulation 32132, subdivision (a), and one day after the request for reconsideration was due; these circumstances do not demonstrate that the respondent made a conscientious effort to timely file and therefore good cause to excuse the late-filed request for extension of time was not found to exist.
1109.01000 – In General
Board denied respondent’s request for extension of time to file request for reconsideration where respondent filed the request for extension of time four days after it was due under PERB Regulation 32132, subdivision (a), and one day after the request for reconsideration was due; these circumstances do not demonstrate that the respondent made a conscientious effort to timely file and therefore good cause to excuse the late-filed request for extension of time was not found to exist.