Decision A397H – Regents of the University of California (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory)

SF-CE-945-H

Decision Date: February 22, 2013

Decision Type: PERB Decision

View Full Text (PDF)

Decision Headnotes

1107.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES;PROCEDURES BEFORE THE BOARD
1107.01000 – Exceptions; Responses to Exceptions; Standing; Extensions of Time/Late Filing/Waiver

After a formal unfair practice hearing resulting in a proposed decision dismissing the unfair practice charge, the proposed decision became final because neither of the parties filed a statement of exceptions; an individual employee on whose behalf the exclusive representative filed a charge of discrimination/retaliation lacked party status to file a statement of exceptions; to accord the employee the right to appellate review of the proposed decision would not only contravene the regulatory rules governing the filing of exceptions, but would also undercut the charging party’s right to control the administrative litigation of its own case.

1109.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; ISSUES ON APPEAL
1109.02000 – Statute of Limitations

Joinder is not appropriate on appeal from an administrative decision denying a request for an extension of time to file a statement of exceptions for lack of party status; to grant joinder would be to revive a proceeding that has already concluded, a result as problematic as "impeding" an ongoing proceeding, which is gorunds for denial of joinder under PERB Regulation 32164.