Decision –
Decision Date:
Decision Type:
Description: Deglow appealed the dismissal of her unfair practice charges alleging that: (1) the District violated the Educational Employment Relations Act (EERA) by failing to correct her hire date; and (2) the Federation violated EERA by working in “collusion” with the District to deny Deglow her correct her date. The Office of the General Counsel dismissed the charges on the grounds that they were untimely and failed to state a prima facie case. Deglow appealed.
Disposition: The Board dismissed the unfair practice charges without leave to amend and denied the District’s request for monetary sanctions without prejudice. However, the Board did issue a new litigation sanction against Deglow.
Decision Headnotes