UNFAIR PRACTICE ISSUES; PROTECTED ACTIVITIES – Distribution of Literature

Single Topic for Decision 0188E

View all topics for Decision 0188E

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

District agent's chastisement of employee who conducted a poll among employees which caused dissension among faculty improper interference with right of employee to engage in protected activity. Certain statements of District agent went beyond bounds of operational necessity and had a coercive meaning viewed in overall context rather than being a legitimate problem-solving conversation; pp. 6-7.