UNFAIR PRACTICE ISSUES; PROTECTED ACTIVITIES – Other

Single Topic for Decision 1063S

View all topics for Decision 1063S

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

While it may be protected for the charging party to advocate the removal of the Chief Engineer I (CE I) classification from the bargaining unit, his stated intention to proceed with a civil tort action regarding CE I involvement on the interview panel and his refusal to take direction from a CE I, are not protected by the Dills Act; p. 27, proposed dec.