UNION UNFAIR PRACTICES; DUTY OF FAIR REPRESENTATION – Grievance Handling/Contract Administration

Single Topic for Decision 1122S


View all topics for Decision 1122S

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

800.00000 – UNION UNFAIR PRACTICES; DUTY OF FAIR REPRESENTATION
800.02000 – Grievance Handling/Contract Administration

* * * OVERRULED by multiple decisions, as recognized in State of California (Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation) (2024) PERB Decision No. 2926-S, pp. 16-19 & fn. 10, because relied on notion that deferral was jurisdictional rather than discretionary, applied standards that are now superseded, and improperly deferred despite the fact deferral is normally improper if individual employees wish to arbitrate but their union controls that decision and declines to arbitrate. * * *

A charging party's "failure to exercise the grievance process," even if that precludes further pursuit of the grievance process and arbitration, "does not create futility" (Desert Sands Unified School District (1995) PERB Decision No. 1102); p. 2, dismissal letter.