CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; LIMITATION PERIOD FOR FILING CHARGE – Computation of Six-Month Period

Single Topic for Decision 1214E

View all topics for Decision 1214E

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

Charge allegation that District bypassed BEA when it met with psychologists "a few days before the end of the year on June 20, 1996," was untimely, since BEA failed to establish that the June meeting with psychologists occurred within six months of dated charge filed (December 10, 1996); p. 6, dismissal letter. Since the charge does not say when District officials took action, it is not possible to determine whether the charge was timely filed; p. 5, warning letter.