UNION UNFAIR PRACTICES;RESTRAINT, COERCION, INTERFERENCE OR DISCRIMINATION – In General

Single Topic for Decision 1288S

View all topics for Decision 1288S

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

To demonstrate that an exclusive representative discriminated against a charging party in violation of Dills Act section 3519.5(b), the charging party must show that: (1) the unit member exercised rights under the Dills Act; (2) the exclusive representative had knowledge of the exercise of those rights; and (3) the exclusive representative imposed or threatened to impose reprisals, discriminated or threatened to discriminate or otherwise interfered with, restrained or coerced the unit member because of the exercise of those rights, citing Novato; p. 2, dismissal letter.