EMPLOYER DISCRIMINATION; PERSONS PROTECTED – In General

Single Topic for Decision 1484S

View all topics for Decision 1484S

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

Where there is no evidence in the record to suggest that charging party ever held a civil service position and was a civil service employee within the meaning of Section 3513(c) and charging party failed to establish he was a bona fide applicant for a vacant civil service position within the meaning of Section 3519(a), charging party has not established that the decisions made by various agencies to no longer purchase his services as an interpreter were covered by the Dills Act.