EMPLOYER DISCRIMINATION; EVIDENCE OF UNLAWFUL MOTIVATION; NEXUS – Other/In General

Single Topic for Decision 1532E

View all topics for Decision 1532E

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

Charge alleged that District was satisfied with employee’s performance up to employee’s departure. Afterwards, District’s only contact with employee was in employee’s position as union representative. District’s refusal to re-hire employee because employee’s District reference was inadequate is circumstantial evidence that District was motivated by anti-union animus.