CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; LIMITATION PERIOD FOR FILING CHARGE – In General

Single Topic for Decision 1726E

View all topics for Decision 1726E

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

After respondent asserts statute of limitations defense and charging party provides no information indicating why charge filed six years after conduct alleging breach of duty of fair representation occurred should be considered timely, burden is not met. Charge is not timely when filed six years after alleged conduct (EERA sec. 3541.5 (A)(1)).