CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; LIMITATION PERIOD FOR FILING CHARGE – In General
Single Topic for Decision 1726E
Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text
1101.01000 – In General
After respondent asserts statute of limitations defense and charging party provides no information indicating why charge filed six years after conduct alleging breach of duty of fair representation occurred should be considered timely, burden is not met. Charge is not timely when filed six years after alleged conduct (EERA sec. 3541.5 (A)(1)).