No items found

Single Topic for Decision 1995H

View all topics for Decision 1995H

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

University did not lay off employee in retaliation for union activities. While decision maker had knowledge of employee’s union activities, union animus held by employee’s supervisors is not imputed to decision maker, and layoff decision was not so economically indefensible that it must have been the product of unlawful motivation.