CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; LIMITATION PERIOD FOR FILING CHARGE – In General

Single Topic for Decision 2016E

View all topics for Decision 2016E

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

The issue of improperly adjusting charging party's seniority ranking has been known to charging party since at least 2003. The corrected copy of the exam results received in August 2006, containing the adjusted seniority ranking, reflected the District's prior action to change the seniority ranking and therefore any allegation related to this conduct is untimely. The six-month statutory limitations period commences on the date that conduct constituting an unfair practice is discovered, rather than the date of the discovery of the legal significance of the conduct.