CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; LIMITATION PERIOD FOR FILING CHARGE – In General

Single Topic for Decision 2172M

View all topics for Decision 2172M

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

Charge untimely when filed more than six months after charging party first learned of letter of understanding between his union and employer that would require him to obtain and maintain pediatric registry as a condition of continued employment as a cardiac sonographer. The Board rejected charging party’s claim on appeal that the discovery date alleged in the original charge was erroneous; charging party could have corrected the alleged mistake in his amended charge but did not do so.