UNFAIR PRACTICE PROCEDURES; COMPLIANCE – In General

Single Topic for Decision 2336M

View all topics for Decision 2336M

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

Layoff of employees in charging party's classification, which occurred subsequent to unlawful retaliatory dismissal of charging party but prior to Board's reinstatement and back pay order, does not excuse respondent's failure to comply with order of reinstatement; the reinstatement and back pay order became effective as of the date the proposed decision in the unfair practice proceeding would have become final if the respondent had not filed a statement of exceptions, not as of the date of the Board's decision affirming the administrative law judge's order.