EMPLOYER DISCRIMINATION; DEFENSES – In General

Single Topic for Decision 2391H

View all topics for Decision 2391H

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

CSUEB demonstrated that it had, and acted because of, an alternative, non-discriminatory reason for denying Charging Party tenure and promotion, specifically Charging Party’s inadequate performance in the areas of instructional achievement, academic achievement and university and community service.