SCOPE OF REPRESENTATION – Retirement

Single Topic for Decision 2427M

View all topics for Decision 2427M

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

Where pension plan provisions relied on by the unions did not confer an absolute right to “permanency” in the particular benefits or contributions formulas, unions failed to show that changes to employee pension contribution formulas were “vested rights” beyond the scope of mandatory bargaining. Because no vested rights were identified, the Board declined to consider whether, or under what circumstances, vested rights may be modified through collective bargaining.