CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES;PROCEDURES BEFORE THE BOARD – Unalleged Violations

Single Topic for Decision 2505M

View all topics for Decision 2505M

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

Charging Party’s allegation that the City had unilaterally imposed a Memorandum of Understanding, in violation of MMBA section 3505.7, and its allegation that the City had unilaterally imposed terms materially different from those in its LBFO, arose from the same City Council action, but were not sufficiently identified as separate theories of liability at hearing. Because the requirement of notice is not satisfied, the Board could not consider the illegal MOU allegation under PERB’s unalleged violations test. (pp. 26-27.)