EMPLOYER INTERFERENCE, RESTRAINT, COERCION; DEFENSES – Business Necessity

Single Topic for Decision 2666E

View all topics for Decision 2666E

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

The evidence supporting the employer’s burden on the retaliation allegations is also sufficient to meet its burden in response to the concurrent interference allegations, i.e., that operational necessity justified any harm to charging party’s protected rights. (p. 7, fn. 6.)