CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; COMPLAINT – Parties

Single Topic for Decision 2687H

View all topics for Decision 2687H

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

Where underlying unfair practice charge listed both union and alleged discriminatee as charging parties, but complaint and proposed decision listed only union as charging party, the Board noted that in practical effect, there is often no difference in the outcome of a discrimination charge, irrespective of whether the charging parties include the alleged discriminatee, her union, or both. Given the possibility that this technical question could impact who has right to seek reconsideration or judicial review of Board’s decision, the Board clarified that both union and alleged discriminatee were charging parties.