EMPLOYER INTERFERENCE, RESTRAINT, COERCION; DEFENSES – Business Necessity

Single Topic for Decision 2702M


View all topics for Decision 2702M

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

409.00000 – EMPLOYER INTERFERENCE, RESTRAINT, COERCION; DEFENSES
409.01000 – Business Necessity

A history of union insignia display in the workplace without resulting incidents is relevant to determine whether special circumstances exist (p. 11), and a history of allowing non-union related items on hardhats without incident also weighs against finding special circumstances (p. 14.) An employer need not wait until an actual injury occurs before banning union insignia for safety reasons; but to establish safety-based special circumstances to support such a ban, the employer must present concrete evidence that employee safety is foreseeably threatened by displaying the union insignia and that it has acted consistently with its stated concern. (p. 14.)